Ford Excursion 1999 vs Chevrolet Suburban 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.7 Petrol | 6.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Excursion) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chevrolet Suburban) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 314 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 578 NM | 583 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Excursion engine produces 120 HP more power than Chevrolet Suburban, but torque is 5 NM less than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 19.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 167 litres | 159 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.76 m | 5.59 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford Excursion is larger. Ford Excursion is 17 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Excursion is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1359 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4145 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 4`037 | 3`901 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Excursion has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |