Ford Excursion 2003 vs Chevrolet Suburban 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.9 Diesel | 6.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 325 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 745 NM | 583 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Excursion engine produces 131 HP more power than Chevrolet Suburban, whereas torque is 162 NM more than Chevrolet Suburban. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 167 litres | 159 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.76 m | 5.59 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 2.03 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Ford Excursion is larger. Ford Excursion is 17 cm longer than the Chevrolet Suburban, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Excursion is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1359 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4145 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 4`173 kg | 3`901 kg | |
| Net weight: | 3`595 kg | 2`570 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 578 kg | 1`331 kg | |
| Ford Excursion load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Chevrolet Suburban. Therefore, Chevrolet Suburban is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Excursion has
|
Chevrolet Suburban has
| |