Ford Excursion 1999 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.4 - 7.3 (petrol, diesel) | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 325 HP | 114 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 468 - 745 NM | 180 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 - 19.3 | 13.7 - 14.3 | |
|
Ford Excursion petrol engines consumes on average 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Blazer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.76 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Ford Excursion is larger. Ford Excursion is 113 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 19 cm wider, while the height of Ford Excursion is 33 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1376 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4146 litres | 1920 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Excursion has 527 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Blazer. This could mean that the Ford Excursion uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 2226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 4`105 | ~ 2`196 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Excursion has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |