Ford Escape 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017

 
Ford Escape
2019 - 2022
Mazda CX-5
2017 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP155 HP
Torque: 240 NM196 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford Escape engine produces 25 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Mazda CX-5.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.86.9
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Escape consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres56 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
770 km on highway900 km on highway
Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.55 m
Width: 1.88 m1.84 m
Height: 1.74 m1.68 m
Ford Escape is larger.
Ford Escape is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 948 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1851 litres1620 litres
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity.
Ford Escape has 471 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 231 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight: no data2`025 kg
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data19 200
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Mazda CX-5 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv