Ford Escape 2020 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Escape) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Mazda CX-5) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 32 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 56 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Ford Escape is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Escape is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 869 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1722 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |