Ford Escape 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 249 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Ford Escape engine produces 62 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.6 | |
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
Ford Escape is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 405 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Ford Escape has 566 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |