Ford Escape 2013 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012

 
Ford Escape
2013 - 2016
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 178 HP240 HP
Torque: 249 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.8 seconds
Ford Escape engine produces 62 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 91 NM less than Land Rover Freelander.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.09.6
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Escape consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway930 km on highway
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.50 m
Width: 1.84 m1.91 m
Height: 1.68 m1.74 m
Ford Escape is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 971 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1920 litresno data
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity.
Ford Escape has 566 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`505
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data9200
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv