Ford Escape 2013 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 90 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 126 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.7 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Ford Escape has 515 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 352 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Ford Escape can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |