Ford Escape 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 17 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 9 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Escape can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Escape version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Ford Escape 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1920 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 251 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |