Ford Escape 2013 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 168 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 16 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2012: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Escape is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 971 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1920 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 300 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`058 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |