Ford Escape 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Ford Escape) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 23 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 179 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Ford Escape can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`986 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |