Ford Escape 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 75 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 7 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 9.4 | |
| Ford Escape consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Escape is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`986 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
| |