Ford Escape 2008 vs Mazda Tribute 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 223 NM | 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute have the same engine power, but Ford Escape torque is 79 NM less than Mazda Tribute. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 11.3 | |
|
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 889 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`986 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
| |