Ford Escape 2008 vs Mazda Tribute 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 232 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Mazda Tribute. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.0 | |
| Ford Escape consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 889 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`986 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |