Ford Escape 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 271 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Escape is more dynamic to drive. Ford Escape engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Thanks to more power Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.8 | |
| Ford Escape consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Ford Escape has 477 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`054 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |