Ford Escape 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003

 
Ford Escape
2000 - 2008
Nissan X-Trail
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 203 HP165 HP
Torque: 271 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.1 seconds
Ford Escape engine produces 38 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Nissan X-Trail.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.19.6
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Escape consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 225 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
630 km on highway750 km on highway
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.51 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.70 m1.68 m
Ford Escape is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 934 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1835 litres1841 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 6 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9852`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): no data2600
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Nissan X-Trail has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv