Ford Escape 2005 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Ford Escape
2005 - 2008
Land Rover Freelander
2000 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Hybrid2.5 Petrol
Hybrid engines (Ford Escape) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Land Rover Freelander) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways.

Performance

Power: 135 HP177 HP
Torque: 175 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.1 seconds
Ford Escape engine produces 42 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Land Rover Freelander.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 7.6 l/100km12.4 l/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: no data22.80 €
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Petrol€/l
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle470 km in combined cycle
800 km on highway600 km on highway
Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.45 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.70 m1.76 m
Ford Escape is smaller.
Ford Escape is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 934 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1835 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7452`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data1800
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv