Ford Escape 2005 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Escape) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Nissan X-Trail), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 1 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 139 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 14.80 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Escape is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 6 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`745 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |