Ford Escape 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Escape) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Honda CR-V), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 165 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 13.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Escape is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 409 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |