Ford Escape 2005 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Ford Escape is more dynamic to drive. Ford Escape engine produces 11 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.4 | |
|
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Ford Escape has 566 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
| |