Ford Escape 2005 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Hybrid | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Ford Maverick. Despite less power, Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 11.1 | |
|
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Ford Escape has 51 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |