Ford Escape 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 206 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Ford Escape engine produces 22 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Escape is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Ford Escape gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |