Ford Escape 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Ford Escape is more dynamic to drive. Ford Escape engine produces 12 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
| Ford Escape consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Ford Escape over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Ford Escape is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |