Ford Escape 2000 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escape engine produces 21 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Escape consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Escape is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 407 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Escape (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |