Ford Escape 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Ford Escape engine produces 11 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.1 | |
| Ford Escape consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford Escape is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 6 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`872 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |