Ford Escape 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001

 
Ford Escape
2000 - 2008
Mazda Tribute
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 129 HP124 HP
Torque: 183 NM175 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds13 seconds
Ford Escape is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Escape engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mazda Tribute. Thanks to more power Ford Escape reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.59.4
Ford Escape consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Escape could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
660 km on highway820 km on highway
Mazda Tribute gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.40 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.70 m1.71 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 934 litres368 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1835 litres2245 litres
Ford Escape has 566 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`8721`915
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data3200
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda Tribute has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv