Ford Escape 2008 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Escape is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Freelander can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Escape also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Land Rover Freelander is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 240 HP | 150 - 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 223 NM | 317 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 10.5 | 6.9 - 11.2 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Escape is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 179 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Ford Escape can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |