Ford Escape 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Escape
2008 - 2012
Nissan X-Trail
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.3 - 3.0 (petrol)2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan X-Trail is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 145 - 240 HP136 - 165 HP
Torque: 136 - 223 NM192 - 314 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.9 - 13.1 seconds
In general, Nissan X-Trail are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Escape. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.6 - 10.57.1 - 10.0
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.51 m
Width: 1.85 m1.76 m
Height: 1.73 m1.70 m
Ford Escape is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 934 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1792 litres1841 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 49 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail.
Gross weight: ~ 1`986 kg~ 2`009 kg
Net weight:~ 1`605 kg~ 1`466 kg
Load capacity:~ 381 kg~ 543 kg
Ford Escape load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 43 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 68002000
Pros and Cons: Ford Escape has
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Nissan X-Trail has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv