Ford Escape 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 240 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 223 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 10.5 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Ford Escape is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Escape is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |