Ford Escape 2008 vs Mazda Tribute 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 3.0 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 - 240 HP | 171 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 223 NM | 232 - 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 10.5 | 9.1 - 11.3 | |
|
On average, the Ford Escape petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mazda Tribute. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 889 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1792 litres | 1903 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Escape is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`986 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |