Ford Escape 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Escape is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Freelander can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Escape also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 203 HP | 112 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 271 NM | 160 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.7 | 8.6 - 12.4 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Ford Escape is smaller. Ford Escape and Land Rover Freelander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
| |