Ford Escape 2000 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 203 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 271 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.7 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Ford Escape is 12 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Escape has 524 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 6 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |