Ford Escape 2000 vs Mazda Tribute 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 - 203 HP | 124 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 271 NM | 175 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 11.8 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 11.7 | 9.4 - 12.8 | |
|
Ford Escape petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda Tribute. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Escape and Mazda Tribute are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 934 litres | 457 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1835 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Ford Escape has 477 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`878 | ~ 1`992 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Escape has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |