Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014

 
Ford EcoSport
2017 -
Suzuki Vitara
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP140 HP
Torque: 170 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds10.2 seconds
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 40 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.4
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres47 litres
740 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 190 mm (7.5 inches)185 mm (7.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.18 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.65 m1.61 m
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher.
Ford EcoSport is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1145 litres1120 litres
Ford EcoSport has 55 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 25 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`730
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably better
Average price (€): 14 80014 600
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki Vitara has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • has 4x4 drive
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv