Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 40 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2014 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 8 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1145 litres | 1120 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 55 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`730 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`274 kg | 1`210 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 456 kg | 520 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Suzuki Vitara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |