Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Captur, but torque is 10 NM less than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 3.9 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Captur 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1145 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 57 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`805 kg | 1`762 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`348 kg | 1`190 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 457 kg | 572 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Renault Captur. Therefore, Renault Captur is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Renault Captur has
| |