Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Opel Mokka. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 23 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford EcoSport scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |