Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.57 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 112 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |