Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 14 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.0 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Swift | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 97 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 31 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |