Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Mini Countryman 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 67 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.2 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 117 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |