Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford EcoSport 2017, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Ford EcoSport 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2017 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2017 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1145 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport 2013 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`715 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`350 kg | 1`274 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 365 kg | 456 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Ford EcoSport 2017. Therefore, Ford EcoSport 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |