Ford EcoSport 2016 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 118 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Ford EcoSport is more dynamic to drive. Ford EcoSport engine produces 58 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.16 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.56 m | |
Ford EcoSport is larger. Ford EcoSport is 11 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1194 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 17 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 44 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`582 | |
Safety: | |||
Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Peugeot 2008 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9800 | 6800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |