Ford EcoSport 2016 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Renegade is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 30 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Renegade. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Renegade, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 18 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |