Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014

 
Ford EcoSport
2013 - 2015
Suzuki Vitara
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP120 HP
Torque: 205 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds12.4 seconds
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving.
Ford EcoSport engine produces 30 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.64.2
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1110 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1170 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 180 mm (7.1 inches)185 mm (7.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.18 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.65 m1.61 m
Ford EcoSport is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 333 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1238 litres710 litres
Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 42 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 528 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7451`870
Safety:
Suzuki Vitara scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Vitara scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

high
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 780011 800
Pros and Cons: Ford EcoSport has
  • lower price
Suzuki Vitara has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv