Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2017 is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport 2013 engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford EcoSport 2017, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Ford EcoSport 2017. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.3 | |
|
The Ford EcoSport 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport 2013 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport 2017, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Ford EcoSport 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport 2013 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport 2013 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 is 18 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2017, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1145 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 has 13 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport 2017. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport 2013 (by 93 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`745 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`384 kg | 1`348 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 361 kg | 457 kg | |
| Ford EcoSport 2013 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Ford EcoSport 2017. Therefore, Ford EcoSport 2017 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport 2013 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport 2017, so Ford EcoSport 2017 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |