Ford EcoSport 2013 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 140 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 28 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.2 | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford EcoSport engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Suzuki Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
Ford EcoSport is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | no data | |
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford EcoSport has 42 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. This could mean that the Ford EcoSport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`730 | |
Safety: | |||
Suzuki Vitara scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Vitara scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford EcoSport has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |