Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 34 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Grand Vitara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller. Ford EcoSport is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | no data | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 65 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |