Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 55 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Ford EcoSport has 51 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford EcoSport (by 19 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |