Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda HR-V, but torque is 43 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 98 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 218 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |