Ford EcoSport 2015 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Honda HR-V. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford EcoSport consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford EcoSport could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford EcoSport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford EcoSport version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Ford EcoSport is smaller, but higher. Ford EcoSport is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 333 litres | 393 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 60 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 218 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford EcoSport is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Ford EcoSport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |