Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport engine produces 26 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 41 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |