Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Ford EcoSport 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Ford EcoSport 2017 engine produces 26 HP more power than Ford EcoSport 2012, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Ford EcoSport 2012. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford EcoSport 2017 is 9 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport 2012, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport 2017 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 310 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1238 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Ford EcoSport 2012 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford EcoSport 2017 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`800 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |