Ford EcoSport 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Ford EcoSport engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 23 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Ford EcoSport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford EcoSport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford EcoSport consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Ford EcoSport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford EcoSport consumes 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1260 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Ford EcoSport is 41 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford EcoSport is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1238 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Ford EcoSport has 54 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 603 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford EcoSport has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |